You are here:

P.R.O.F.S.

Name: P.R.O.F.S.
Director: Patrick Schulmann
Released: 1985
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

3.3/10

Limited

1985

Director

Patrick Schulmann

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

P.R.O.F.S. is primarily an anti-authoritarian comedy focused on the social friction within a high school environment. The plot follows a group of four teachers who use pranks and tricks to disrupt the rigid routines and institutional hierarchies of their colleagues. While the film critiques traditional Western educational structures and professional norms, it lacks demographic diversity. The narrative focuses on institutional subversion rather than addressing multi-layered issues related to race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does P.R.O.F.S. have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that question the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender. The story revolves around the personal relationships among a group of professionals.

How does P.R.O.F.S. portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on young teachers who challenge the established authority of their institution. However, there is no specific evidence of gendered power dynamics or roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is P.R.O.F.S.?

Limited

The narrative does not provide information about the racial makeup of the cast. There is no indication of intentional racial diversity in the setting.

How does P.R.O.F.S. represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores anti-authoritarian themes by challenging the educational system. The protagonists use pranks to undermine the strict professional norms of their colleagues.

Does P.R.O.F.S. include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities mentioned in the narrative.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional Western institutional hierarchies and professional norms.
Provides a narrative of anti-authoritarianism through the disruption of educational routines.

Limited or Absent

Lacks documented racial and ethnic diversity within the ensemble cast.
Does not include explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth characters.
Fails to address disability representation or specific gendered power dynamics.

Official Synopsis

A clique of four young teachers at a high school looks critically at their colleagues. To avoid falling in the same routine, they bring new ideas into the school lessons and play little games and pranks in their spare time -- sometimes get even more childish than their pupils. When they get opposition from the other teachers, they play tricks to get rid of them.

How are these scores produced? →