Dirty Deeds
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Cheats
2002
PG-13Director
Andrew Gurland
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
While other kids buy into countless hours of studying just so they can get a mark in some teacher's report book, Handsome Davis sees it as nothing more than a system of control over your mind. That's why Handsome and his three best friends Sammy, Victor and the cribsheet genius Applebee have banded together and found ways to cheat on their tests all through their school years.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.2/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on heteronormative social hierarchies. There is no evidence of queer characters or narratives that engage with non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Agency is concentrated within an all-male protagonist group. While female actors appear in supporting roles, they do not disrupt traditional gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast and setting suggest a homogeneous, Anglo-centric peer group. The film lacks a non-white majority or diverse racial casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a mild critique of academic institutions as systems of control. However, it lacks a broader critique of systemic oppression.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities.
Strengths
- Provides a mild critique of institutional authority and academic rigor.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional depth or representation of marginalized identities.
- Concentrates narrative agency almost exclusively within a male protagonist group.
- Maintains a homogeneous, Anglo-centric social environment.
AI Analysis
Cheats operates as a standard early-2000s teen comedy focused on adolescent rebellion. The narrative prioritizes male-driven plots of academic subversion and delinquency over social critique. While the film deconstructs institutional authority by framing school as a mechanism of control, it fails to incorporate intersectional depth. The social environment remains largely homogeneous, adhering to the conventional hierarchies of its era. Ultimately, the film lacks intentionality regarding marginalized identities. It functions as a localized story of individualistic mischief rather than a disruption of systemic power dynamics.
Similar Movies
General Education
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
DisOrientation
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Brain Drain
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Bald
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Public Friends
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
National Lampoon's Senior Trip
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
P.R.O.F.S.
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Zur Hölle mit den Paukern
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Boxboarders!
2007
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Lower Learning
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Beware the Gonzo
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.