You are here:
The Anabasis of May and Fusako Shigenobu, Masao Adachi, and 27 Years Without Images

The Anabasis of May and Fusako Shigenobu, Masao Adachi, and 27 Years Without Images

2011

Director

Eric Baudelaire

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A film on exile, revolution, landscapes and memory, Anabasis brings forth the remarkable parallel stories of Adachi and May, one a filmmaker who gave up images, the other a young woman whose identity-less existence forbade keeping images of her own life. Fittingly returning the image to their lives, director Eric Baudelaire places Adachi and May’s revelatory voiceover reminiscences against warm, fragile Super-8mm footage of their split milieus, Tokyo and Beirut. Grounding their wide-ranging reflections in a solid yet complex reality, Anabasis provides a richly rewarding look at a fascinating, now nearly forgotten era (in politics and cinema), reminding us of film’s own ability to portray—and influence—its landscape.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

7.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film does not explicitly center LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. While it explores personal intimacy within revolutionary milieus, there is no documented evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or same-sex romantic arcs.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering the political agency of women. By focusing on May and Fusako Shigenobu, the film elevates female subjects to central protagonists of a revolutionary era.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The film provides a nuanced look at Japanese political history, avoiding Western-centric tropes. Its movement between Tokyo and Beirut introduces a post-colonial dimension regarding displacement and global political identities.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film explores the deconstruction of Western-aligned state structures through the Japanese New Left. It prioritizes anti-capitalist ideologies and examines the friction between individual memory and state-sanctioned history.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's narrative or historical context.

Strengths

  • Elevates female subjects to central protagonists with significant political agency.
  • Provides a nuanced, non-Western-centric perspective on Japanese political history.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of systemic structures and anti-capitalist ideologies.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation or focus on LGBTQ+ identities and narratives.
  • Does not address physical or neurodivergent disabilities within its subject matter.

AI Analysis

The documentary excels by subverting gendered power dynamics, transforming women from historical footnotes into central political actors. It offers a sophisticated critique of state-sanctioned history and the ethics of the image. While the film provides a deep, intersectional look at Japanese radicalism and post-colonial landscapes, it remains neutral regarding LGBTQ+ identities. The focus stays firmly on political and intellectual contributions rather than queer subtext. Overall, the work is a progressive piece of cinema that challenges conventional memorialization of historical movements through a postmodern, anti-establishment lens.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.