You are here:

Easy Money: Hard to Kill

Name: Easy Money: Hard to Kill
Director: Babak Najafi
Released: 2012
Duration: 99 min

Representation Score

4.4/10

Fair

2012

Not Rated

Director

Babak Najafi

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Easy Money: Hard to Kill is a gritty, realist exploration of systemic entrapment. It prioritizes the cyclical nature of criminality and the struggle for reintegration over diverse identity politics. The film's strength lies in its portrayal of complex social hierarchies and the friction between individual ability to act and corruption. However, it remains tethered to traditional masculine archetypes and lacks representation for LGBTQ+ and female characters. While the setting suggests a diverse urban landscape, the narrative lacks explicit focus on multi-layered themes or disability representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Easy Money: Hard to Kill have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film follows a traditional crime-drama framework focused on gang affiliation. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that challenge the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Easy Money: Hard to Kill portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on masculine archetypes of violence and survival. It lacks female characters with significant roles in driving the story or subverting established gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Easy Money: Hard to Kill?

Good

The narrative engages with urban social stratification and gang dynamics. This suggests a likely use of diverse casting to reflect complex, modern urban environments.

How does Easy Money: Hard to Kill represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film critiques systemic structures like prison and venture capitalism through a lens of noir fatalism. It explores the illusion of redemption within corrupt institutions.

Does Easy Money: Hard to Kill include disability representation?

Minimal

The synopsis provides no information regarding characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities.

Present on Screen

Engages with urban social stratification and complex gang dynamics.
Provides a critique of systemic corruption and the illusion of redemption.
Explores non-traditional social hierarchies within a realist crime framework.

Limited or Absent

Lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives.
Relies heavily on traditional masculine archetypes of violence.
Provides little to no ability to act for female characters within the plot.

Official Synopsis

JW is serving hard time in prison and struggling to get back on an honest path. There are glimmers of hope in his life – some venture capitalists are interested in a new piece of trading software he's developed, and while behind bars he's made peace with an old enemy. This all proves to be an illusion. On leave from prison, and back in contact with his former gang, JW learns that once you've walked in the shoes of a criminal there just may be no going back.

How are these scores produced? →