You are here:
The Times of the Surveyors

The Times of the Surveyors

1968

Director

Voldemārs Pūce

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Land surveyors arrive in two parishes to measure and redistribute manor land. The rivalry between both feoffees for land and woman begins.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any depiction of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The plot centers on a romantic rivalry between men for a woman, following a traditional heteronormative framework.

Gender Representation

Limited

Gender roles follow conventional hierarchies where male agency drives the central conflict. The female character serves primarily as an object of desire or a prize within the male rivalry.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The setting reflects the demographic homogeneity of rural parishes in 1968 Latvia. There is no evidence of diverse ethnic representation beyond the local historical context.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative explores the disruption of feudal power through land redistribution. It focuses on the transition of ownership and the dissolution of old manor systems.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The film appears to adhere to the ableist standards typical of mid-century historical dramas.

Strengths

  • Engages with historical themes of land redistribution and the dissolution of feudal manor systems.
  • Provides a localized look at the sociopolitical transitions of the era through historical realism.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks female agency, as women are positioned as prizes in male-driven conflicts.
  • Fails to include diverse ethnic, LGBTQ+, or disability representation.
  • Relies on traditional romantic tropes that reinforce conventional gender hierarchies.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a traditional period drama, relying heavily on established historical tropes. Its narrative structure prioritizes land disputes and romantic competition over social subversion or diverse identity representation. While the film engages with the systemic shift of land ownership, it remains focused on individualistic struggles. This approach limits its ability to critique broader class or institutional structures effectively. Ultimately, the work reinforces conventional social hierarchies. It lacks significant representation of marginalized identities, focusing instead on a localized, homogeneous historical realism.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.