You are here:
Angkor

Angkor

1935

Approved

Director

L.C. Cook, George M. Merrick

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Basically a travelogue featuring footage of Angkor Wat (in Cambodia) shot by a couple of explorers in the WWI years, with additional footage shot on a set in Hollywood by George M. Merrick.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.2/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any discernible narrative focus on non-cisnormative identities. As a travelogue centered on historical landmarks, there is no evidence of queer subtext.

Gender Representation

Limited

The film follows the traditional 1930s explorer trope, which prioritizes male agency. Women do not occupy roles of intellectual or physical authority.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Representation of Cambodian people is observational rather than participatory. Local populations appear as part of an exotic landscape rather than characters with individual agency.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The film reinforces Western perspectives of the East as a site for discovery. It lacks anti-colonial sentiment or the deconstruction of Western institutional power.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent identities within the film.

Strengths

  • Provides archival footage of the Angkor Wat complex in Cambodia.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks individual agency for local populations, treating them as part of the landscape.
  • Reinforces colonial-era perspectives and Western-centric viewpoints.
  • Fails to provide meaningful representation for women or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Lacks character-driven complexity to allow for intersectional depth.

AI Analysis

Angkor (1935) functions as a hybrid travelogue that blends archival footage of Angkor Wat with staged Hollywood studio sequences. Because the film focuses on landscape and ethnographic observation rather than character-driven narrative, it lacks the capacity for nuanced representation. The work is a product of its temporal context, reinforcing colonial-era hierarchies. It positions Western explorers as the primary observers of non-Western heritage, treating the local culture as an object of study rather than a source of agency. Ultimately, the film serves to archive foreign sites through a Western-dominated framework. It does not challenge the social hierarchies or the traditional 'explorer' tropes prevalent during its production era.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.