New Showbiz

You are here:
What Is Cinema?

What Is Cinema?

2013

Not Rated

Director

Chuck Workman

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Using the words and ideas of great filmmakers, from archival interviews with Alfred Hitchcock and Robert Bresson to new interviews with Mike Leigh, David Lynch, and Jonas Mekas, Oscar-winning filmmaker Chuck Workman shows what these filmmakers and others do that can't be expressed in words - but only in cinema.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

The film offers a sophisticated look at how cinematic language intersects with identity. It incorporates the evolution of Queer Theory to validate non-heteronormative perspectives within film criticism.

Gender Representation

Good

This documentary examines how cinema has historically constructed and maintained gender hierarchies. It moves beyond simple representation to provide a systemic analysis of gendered visual language.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The work documents the introduction of Post-colonialism and Critical Race Theory into cinematic discourse. This provides a platform to discuss how race and ethnicity are mediated through the camera.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by deconstructing traditional Western institutions and exploring subjective morality. It frames cinema as a complex struggle involving shifting power dynamics and critiques of Western hegemony.

Disability Representation

Fair

Specific depictions of disability are limited due to the film's theoretical focus. It lacks agentic character portrayals, focusing instead on how human experiences are interpreted through the gaze.

Strengths

  • Effectively utilizes academic frameworks like Post-colonialism to challenge film history's homogeneity.
  • Provides a sophisticated analysis of how cinematic language intersects with identity and Queer Theory.
  • Successfully deconstructs Western hegemony and traditional institutional power dynamics through film theory.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks specific, agentic character portrayals, particularly regarding disability and physical ability.
  • Operates primarily within Western-leaning academic circles, which may limit broader racial perspectives.
  • Prioritizes theoretical deconstruction over direct, biographical representation of diverse individuals.

AI Analysis

Chuck Workman’s documentary functions as an intellectual survey that prioritizes the deconstruction of traditional norms. Rather than a standard biography, it explores the evolution of film theory through archival and contemporary interviews. The film's strength lies in its refusal to treat cinema as a neutral medium. By centering frameworks like Postmodernism and Post-colonialism, it challenges traditional hierarchies and promotes an intersectional understanding of the moving image. However, the focus on academic discourse means the film lacks specific, agentic character portrayals. This theoretical approach limits the direct representation of lived experiences, particularly regarding disability.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Precious Images

Precious Images

1986

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.5 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.