You are here:

Terminal Choice

Terminal Choice

Representation Score

3.4/10

Limited

1985

R

Director

Sheldon Larry

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Terminal Choice is a genre-driven thriller that emphasizes procedural mystery and suspense over social commentary. The narrative centers around a male protagonist investigating a medical conspiracy, using standard clichés from the 1980s horror and thriller genres. The film adheres to the conventional casting and thematic norms of its time, lacking significant representation of diverse identities. While female characters hold professional positions, the story remains focused on a masculine-led investigation. The portrayal of medical crises serves the plot's tension rather than exploring the lived experiences of disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Terminal Choice have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories that explore queer themes. Relationships among characters are mostly professional and platonic within a medical context.

How does Terminal Choice portray gender?

Fair

Female characters such as Dr. Anna Lang and Mary Connor have professional roles. They mainly serve as catalysts for the male protagonist's investigation and do not take leading roles themselves.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Terminal Choice?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the homogenous casting standards of the 1980s. There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

How does Terminal Choice represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story unfolds within a typical Western institutional framework, focusing on professional ethics and malpractice. It does not critique Western cultural or religious structures.

Does Terminal Choice include disability representation?

Minimal

Illness and deadly sickness are used as plot devices to create suspense. These elements do not delve into the lived experiences of neurodivergence or physical disability.

Present on Screen

  • Female characters hold professional roles such as doctors and dissectors.
  • The narrative focuses on professional ethics and accountability.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks LGBTQ+ representation and stories involving queer themes.
  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Illness is used as a plot device without meaningful exploration of disability.
  • Female characters primarily function as catalysts for the male lead.

Official Synopsis

A patient in an hospital dies under mysterious circumstances. The attending doctor Frank Holt gets under suspect - he'd been fired already from his last position due to malpractice. For his defense he investigates with help of doctor Anna Lang. Soon they find out that half of their colleagues were betting on the patient's diagnosis - was someone trying to increase his chances? But when Frank's friend, dissector Mary Connor, becomes deadly sick, he suspects there's even more to it.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.