You are here:
This Is America

This Is America

1977

R

Director

Romano Vanderbes

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Inspired by shock-documentaries like Mondo Cane, this film looks at the wilder side of life in America. Starting off with the bloodier side of the American car culture by showing a series of crashes at race events, the film then goes on to lesser-known sexual practices. Included among these is a porno movie award show, a nude beauty contest, a sex therapy session, and a detailed explanation of where dildos come from.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores non-normative sexual practices and behaviors that deviate from heteronormative standards. However, it lacks explicit confirmation of specific queer identities or character-driven arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

Representation centers on the spectacle of gendered bodies through nude beauty contests and sex therapy. It departs from conservative depictions but lacks evidence of women exercising true agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film provides no specific details regarding the racial or ethnic composition of its subjects. Its focus on car culture and sexual subcultures leaves this aspect unverified.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary adopts a posture of moral relativism by centering on transgressive social behaviors. It challenges traditional Western values and the sanctity of the conventional family unit.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence that the film addresses neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions with any meaningful agency or representation.

Strengths

  • Challenges mainstream social stability and traditional Western institutional values.
  • Provides a critique of social conformity by focusing on transgressive subcultures.
  • Disrupts conventional perceptions of morality through its shock-documentary style.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks documented intersectional depth or specific character-driven identity arcs.
  • Fails to provide meaningful representation or agency for individuals with disabilities.
  • Gender representation relies on the spectacle of bodies rather than subverting hierarchies.

AI Analysis

This documentary functions as a study of social transgression, utilizing a shock-documentary lens to disrupt conventional American morality. It succeeds in deconstructing social taboos by highlighting subcultures that exist outside mainstream norms. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. While it critiques social conformity through its focus on 'deviant' behaviors, it fails to provide specific identity-based narratives or meaningful representation for marginalized groups. The work remains more of a spectacle of the taboo than a structured exploration of identity, prioritizing the disruption of decorum over the agency of its subjects.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.