You are here:

Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog

Name: Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog
Director: Julian Radlmaier
Released: 2017
Duration: 99 min

Representation Score

6.0/10

Good

2017

Director

Julian Radlmaier

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Julian Radlmaier’s satire uses a postmodern perspective to break down class structures and traditional Western morality. Its strength lies in its intellectual approach, treating identity as a political tool. However, the film’s narrow historical focus restricts its racial diversity. While the lack of diversity fits the 1970s Austrian context, it limits a more inclusive experience. Overall, the work is a targeted critique of bourgeois stability, replacing conventional social norms with a focus on ideological contradictions.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film examines sexual identity through political commitment. It portrays non-straight relationships as acts of resistance rather than following typical romantic storylines.

How does Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog portray gender?

Good

The film challenges traditional gender roles by emphasizing ideological struggle over domestic life. It dismantles masculine authority by highlighting political purity and intellectual alignment.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white and European, fitting the 1970s Austrian context. While historically accurate, the film lacks diverse racial and ethnic representation.

How does Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques Western bourgeois institutions and capitalism through radical student activism and moral relativism. It rejects established authority by focusing on ideological conflicts.

Does Self-Criticism of a Bourgeois Dog include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated critique of Western capitalist and bourgeois institutions.
Uses identity as a political tool rather than a personal characteristic.
Effectively employs satire to challenge traditional social hierarchies.

Limited or Absent

Limited racial and ethnic diversity due to the historical setting.
No representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The story of the dog from the title, who in a frame narrative explains how he came to be transformed from an unemployed communist filmmaker into a canine with a philosophical bent. Unable to finance his new project, young Berlin-based director Julian tells foreign exchange student Camille that his job in the countryside is research for an upcoming film. When Camille offers to help, he is forced to uphold the lie. The plantation isn’t the proletarian idyll he had hoped for, but fortunately the reincarnation of Francis of Assisi provides spiritual insight and a new aim in life.

How are these scores produced? →