You are here:
Cheeky

Cheeky

2003

Director

David Thewlis

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Consumed with sadness after the death of his wife and subsequent rejection from his son, a widower, at the urging of his friends, opts to appear on a vulgar, wildly popular game show (for which his wife signed him up) and watches his life start to change for the better.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.6/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The story centers on a widower and his traditional marriage. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or critiques of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film focuses on a male protagonist's emotional journey. While it explores male vulnerability, the wife's role is primarily a catalyst through her absence.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The narrative appears to follow a conventional demographic presentation. There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film examines grief and media influence through a personal lens. It lacks a systemic critique of Western institutions or cultural ideologies.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No specific portrayals of physical or neurodivergent disabilities are present. The narrative only touches upon the universal experience of grief.

Strengths

  • Explores emotional vulnerability in a male protagonist.
  • Provides a nuanced look at the deconstruction of a stable family life.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks diverse racial and ethnic representation within the cast.
  • Fails to include LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Provides limited agency to female characters beyond their role as catalysts.

AI Analysis

Cheeky functions as a conventional character study centered on a male protagonist's grief and familial estrangement. While the film offers a departure from stoic masculinity by exploring emotional vulnerability, the narrative remains anchored in traditional social structures. The production lacks intentionality regarding intersectional representation. The focus stays on a localized, personal tragedy rather than challenging broader social hierarchies or providing diverse casting perspectives. Ultimately, the film reflects the character-driven, traditional dramatic style of the early 2000s, prioritizing individual emotional arcs over systemic or cultural subversion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.