
The Two Parachutists
1965

1968
Director
Lucio Fulci
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Franco, an Italian fisherman, witnesses a U.S. Air Force plane crash in the Mediterranean off Egypt carrying a nuclear weapon, and he is then persued by shady spy, named Ciccio, working for a spy organization led by the sinister Dr. Si (Yes) to find the atom bomb before anyone else does to blackmail the world, which leads to Franco and Ciccio forming an unlikely alliance to get the bomb for themselves.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a male-centric pursuit between a fisherman and a spy. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
Narrative agency is concentrated in male protagonists and a male antagonist. The power dynamics center on masculine roles in espionage and physical retrieval.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The Mediterranean setting offers potential for ethnic intersectionality. However, the plot centers on Western perspectives involving an Italian fisherman and U.S. military elements.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques global institutions through a sinister spy organization. It frames geopolitical volatility as a catalyst for individualistic, chaotic morality.
Disability Representation
The narrative provides no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
How We Stole the Atomic Bomb is a genre-driven comedy that relies heavily on the masculine-driven tropes of 1960s adventure cinema. The plot is propelled by male characters engaged in espionage and physical pursuits, leaving little room for diverse social hierarchies. While the Mediterranean setting suggests a cross-cultural encounter, the perspective remains largely Eurocentric. The film prioritizes stylistic genre experimentation over intentional intersectional character development. Ultimately, the film functions as a critique of institutional stability rather than a vehicle for progressive representation. It remains anchored in the conventional social structures of its era.

1965

1962

1968

1964

1968

1977

1967

1997

1967

2016

1966

1961
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.