
How We Stole the Atomic Bomb
1968

1967
Director
Václav Vorlíček
Runtime
87 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The invincible agent Cyril Juan Borguette alias W4C has been assigned a mission to go to a hotel in Prague, get hold of a saltcellar with a plan for the military exploitation of Venus hidden in it, and hand it over to the beautiful agent Alice. He will have to compete for the saltcellar with other agents working for the world's various greater and smaller powers. The head of the Prague counter-intelligence unit gets news of agent W4C's mission. Deficient in personnel, he nominates accountant Foustka as agent 13B. Mr Foustka takes his dog Pajda with him and the two head for the airport. Pajda helps him track down agent W4C in a classy hotel that becomes the battleground for the interests and plans of the secret agents from different countries, each trying to get hold of the precious saltcellar.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative relationship dynamics. The narrative focus remains centered on the competitive tension between international agents and the central mission.
Gender Representation
The inclusion of Alice, a beautiful agent, places a woman within the professional espionage sphere. While she holds a high-stakes role, her specific agency relative to the male protagonists is not fully detailed.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting in Prague implies a multi-national cast representing various global powers. However, there is no explicit evidence of significant racial blending beyond these international geopolitical identities.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques traditional institutional power by framing military pursuits through absurdity. It undermines state-sponsored militarism by replacing professional operatives with an ordinary citizen and his dog.
Disability Representation
No characters are identified with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative does not provide information regarding the portrayal of neurodivergence or physical impairments.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film functions as a Cold War-era satire that deconstructs the hyper-competent, masculine spy archetype. By replacing a professional operative with an accidental protagonist—an accountant and his dog—it favors a chaotic, egalitarian approach to agency over traditional heroism. While the film offers a clever critique of geopolitical power structures and institutional competence, it lacks depth in intersectional representation. The narrative focuses more on the absurdity of bureaucracy than on diverse human identities. Ultimately, the work's progressive value lies in its subversion of the 'super-spy' trope, though it remains limited in its depiction of gender, race, and sexual orientation.

1968

2017

1968

1967

2006

1964

1969

1968

1965

1967

1981

2000
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.