
Johnny Stecchino
1991

2019
Director
Pierre Godeau
Runtime
89 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
If anyone knows anything about bikes, it’s Raoul Taburin, official bicycle dealer of Saint Céron, a lovely village in the South of France. But Raoul has a terrible secret: he has never been able to keep his balance on a bike without using stabilisers. His childhood and teenage years were spent trying to overcome his flaw - in vain. All attempts to tell his secret have also failed. Nobody believes him. When photographer Hervé Figougne moves to Saint Céron, the two men become fast friends. And when Figougne offers to photograph Raoul riding a racing bike along a mountain precipice, the moment of truth has arrived. He does all he can to avoid the photo shoot. But everything goes against him and he finally has to accept his destiny. “At least”, he thinks, “people will have to believe me”. But for Raoul Taburin, things are never that simple...
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses entirely on Raoul’s personal struggle with physical balance. There is no depiction of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male camaraderie and the protagonist's internal conflict. It lacks female characters, making it difficult to assess diverse gendered perspectives.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set in a rural French village, the film depicts a homogeneous community. The casting reflects a traditionalist, localized social environment without multicultural blending.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a secular, absurdist look at mundane life. It avoids religious or political ideologies, maintaining a neutral and observational stance.
Disability Representation
Raoul’s inability to balance on a bike is treated as a defining identity trait. The film avoids mockery, focusing instead on his psychological struggle for authenticity.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Raoul Taburin is a specialized character study that prioritizes individual eccentricity over broad social representation. Its primary strength is a nuanced, non-caricatured portrayal of a physical limitation that defines the protagonist's life. However, the film's scope is quite narrow. By centering almost exclusively on a male protagonist within a traditional rural setting, it misses opportunities for intersectional depth. The lack of diverse gender, racial, or LGBTQ+ perspectives results in a low overall score. Ultimately, the film succeeds as an intimate humanistic portrait but functions less as a vehicle for systemic social or identity-based narratives.

1991

1987

1988

2015

1992

2018

1949

2001

2014

2018

2002

1999
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.