You are here:

Eyes of Fire

Eyes of Fire

Representation Score

0.9/10

Minimal

1983

R

Director

Avery Crounse

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Eyes of Fire is a traditional supernatural thriller set in the 18th century, emphasizing historical atmosphere over social critique. The narrative upholds established hierarchies, focusing on a white, male-led colonial group trying to preserve their religious and social structures. While the film captures the tensions of the 18th-century frontier, it does so through a narrow lens. It lacks diverse representation, offering limited perspectives for non-white or LGBTQ+ individuals, and adheres closely to the conventional norms of its time.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Eyes of Fire have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. Social interactions focus solely on traditional colonial families and settlers.

How does Eyes of Fire portray gender?

Limited

Male characters dominate leadership and physical action. Women play crucial roles in the settlement's survival but are primarily involved in domestic or supportive tasks.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Eyes of Fire?

Limited

The cast is mostly white, representing the British colonial settlers. The story centers on the settlers' perspective, with little ability to act given to non-white characters.

How does Eyes of Fire represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story highlights the preservation of Western religious traditions and social order. It focuses on maintaining identity without challenging colonial frameworks.

Does Eyes of Fire include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities depicted prominently. No characters with disabilities significantly influence the plot or have substantial ability to act.

Present on Screen

  • The film successfully recreates the historical atmosphere of 18th-century colonial life.

Limited or Absent

  • Non-white characters lack a significant role in driving the story, with the story viewed exclusively through a settler perspective.
  • Gender roles are traditional, confining women to domestic or supportive roles.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or characters within the social dynamics.

Official Synopsis

In 1750, an adulterous preacher is ejected from a small British colony with his motley crew of followers, who make their way downriver to establish a new settlement of their own beyond the western frontier.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.