You are here:
Making Athena

Making Athena

2022

Director

Kourtrajmeuf, Benjamin Weill

Runtime

38 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The making of ATHENA covers the entire production of the film and gives us an in-depth perspective of the scenes that everyone is talking about, from the 12-minute long shot sequence to the scene that sent the cameraman 30 meters above the ground. Highlights include how Romain Gavras brought his vision to the screen, along with his co-writer Ladj Ly and Dali Benssalah (Abdel) and how the music, composed by GENER8TION, plays a unique role to make ATHENA a modern tragedy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.4/10

Good


Category Breakdown

Does Making Athena have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary focuses on technical and creative execution rather than queer identities. It maintains a neutral stance typical of behind-the-scenes documentation without centering non-cisnormative arcs.

How does Making Athena portray gender?

Fair

The production emphasizes a communal creative process over the traditional auteur myth. This collaborative synergy suggests a subversion of standard heroic archetypes in favor of complex character studies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Making Athena?

Excellent

Creative leadership from figures like Ladj Ly and Dali Benssalah ensures a narrative rooted in diverse perspectives. The work deliberately centers non-Anglo-Saxon viewpoints to challenge Western cinematic tropes.

How does Making Athena represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film uses a modern sonic landscape and systemic critique to challenge traditional Western institutions. It prioritizes subjective morality and the friction between individuals and the state.

Does Making Athena include disability representation?

Fair

There is no visible emphasis on neurodivergence or physical disabilities. The technical overview provides no evidence that these themes are central to the production process.

Strengths

  • Exceptional racial diversity through creative leadership and diverse perspectives.
  • Strong cultural representation that challenges traditional Western institutions.
  • A collaborative approach that subverts traditional cinematic hierarchies.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible emphasis on disability or neurodivergent representation.
  • Minimal focus on LGBTQ+ identities or queer character arcs.

Score Reasoning

The documentary excels by documenting a production that prioritizes racial and cultural agency. Through the involvement of diverse creators, it provides a window into a narrative designed to disrupt conventional social structures and Western tropes. However, the film remains largely neutral regarding LGBTQ+ and disability representation. As a technical look at filmmaking, it lacks specific focus on these identities, resulting in a more middle-of-the-road score for those categories. Ultimately, the work is a vital record of intentionality. It captures the construction of a modern tragedy that centers systemic tension and diverse creative leadership.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.