You are here:

Our Trip to Africa

Name: Our Trip to Africa
Director: Peter Kubelka
Released: 1966
Duration: 13 min

Representation Score

1.2/10

Minimal

1966

Director

Peter Kubelka

Runtime

13 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Peter Kubelka’s work functions as a formalist experiment rather than a vehicle for social representation. While the 'ironic brutality' of the editing suggests a deconstruction of the source material, the film remains tethered to the traditional hierarchies of mid-century Western colonial activities. The subject matter—a commissioned wild game hunt—reflects the power dynamics of its era. The film prioritizes structural deconstruction over the promotion of progressive identities or the subversion of systemic power through character actions.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Our Trip to Africa have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The focus on a hunting expedition suggests adherence to conventional social structures.

How does Our Trip to Africa portray gender?

Limited

The narrative centers on a commissioned hunt, which historically reinforces patriarchal roles. There is no evidence of subverted gender roles or significant female involvement.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Our Trip to Africa?

Minimal

The work likely operates within a colonialist framework, documenting a European expedition. Indigenous populations appear as background elements rather than central actors.

How does Our Trip to Africa represent religion and culture?

Limited

While the editing may offer an ironic critique of the expedition, the core subject matter remains rooted in Western expeditionary traditions and dominance over nature.

Does Our Trip to Africa include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence suggesting that disability or neurodivergence plays a role in the film's narrative or character arcs.

Present on Screen

The film uses 'ironic brutality' to potentially critique the colonialist and capitalist impulses of the original expedition footage.

Limited or Absent

The work lacks depth in representing diverse identities, particularly in positioning indigenous populations as background elements within a Western-centric framework.
The narrative reinforces traditional masculine hierarchies and patriarchal roles common to mid-20th-century hunting expeditions.
The film provides no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or neurodivergent perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Originally commissioned by an Austrian couple in 1961 to photograph a travel diary documenting their wild game hunt, Kubelka shot three hours of film and recorded fourteen hours of audio. Over the next few years, Kubelka toiled in the editing bay, producing a work charged with intricate, ironic brutality.

How are these scores produced? →