You are here:
New Trial

New Trial

2017

Not Rated

Director

Kim Tae-yun

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A taxi driver is found dead, and Hyun-woo, the only witness, charged with a murder and serves 10 years in prison. While offering pro bono services, a lawyer Junyoung meets Hyun-woo, and they begin their journey to prove his innocence.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative focuses on legal justice and wrongful conviction rather than sexual orientation. There is a lack of explicit LGBTQ+ character development or queer-coded subtext within the core cast.

Gender Representation

Fair

While male protagonists drive the central conflict, the film avoids traditional patriarchal tropes. It portrays legal and social systems as broken, necessitating a grassroots reclamation of justice.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

As a South Korean production, the film operates within a culturally homogeneous setting. It addresses 'othering' through the lens of social class and the status of a convict.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film excels in critiquing state authority and traditional legal institutions. It highlights the distinction between procedural law and true justice, challenging established power structures.

Disability Representation

Fair

The film explores the psychological and social marginalization imposed by incarceration. It uses the protagonist's ten years in prison as a metaphor for the loss of agency.

Strengths

  • Strong critique of institutional authority and judicial fallibility.
  • Effective portrayal of the systemic underdog reclaiming agency.
  • Nuanced exploration of the distinction between law and justice.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ character development or subtext.
  • Limited racial and ethnic diversity within the homogeneous setting.
  • Minimal focus on clinical or physical disability representation.

AI Analysis

New Trial is a sophisticated legal drama that prioritizes the deconstruction of institutional authority over demographic representation. The film's strength lies in its narrative architecture, which challenges the sanctity of the judicial system and frames the struggle for truth as a rebellion against a corrupt status quo. While the film lacks high scores in explicit identity-based representation, such as multi-ethnic casting or LGBTQ+ development, it finds depth in its critique of systemic power. It successfully shifts the focus from a standard crime trope to the systemic corruption that facilitates injustice. Ultimately, the film celebrates the agency of the systemic underdog. It uses the protagonist's journey from victim to reformer to examine how institutional rigidity can crush individual truth.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.