You are here:

Men of the Hour

Men of the Hour

Representation Score

1.3/10

Minimal

1935

Approved

Director

Lambert Hillyer

Runtime

63 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Men of the Hour is a conventional 1930s genre piece that adheres strictly to the social and narrative hierarchies of its era. The plot is driven by male professional competition and individualistic struggles for redemption. The film lacks meaningful representation of diverse groups, focusing instead on a standard romantic rivalry and professional meritocracy. It reinforces the period's established social norms rather than challenging them. Ultimately, the film functions as a product of the studio system, prioritizing traditional clichés and a homogeneous cast over diverse perspectives.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Men of the Hour have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film centers on a traditional romantic rivalry between two male colleagues. There is no indication of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives that critique the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Men of the Hour portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on a male-dominated professional environment. Ann Jordan serves as an emotional catalyst and object of desire, but occupies a relatively passive role.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Men of the Hour?

Minimal

The narrative focuses on a white-coded professional rivalry. The film likely reflects the homogeneous casting standards typical of the early sound era.

How does Men of the Hour represent religion and culture?

Limited

The plot operates within a traditional capitalist framework centered on career advancement. It emphasizes professional success and the conventional morality of 1930s cinema.

Does Men of the Hour include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The film provides a clear, focused narrative regarding professional integrity and individual redemption.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks gender diversity, placing female characters in passive roles.
  • There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity in the character dynamics.
  • The story offers no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Dave Durkin and Andy Blane are a pair of ace newsreel cameramen with Durkin being the assistant who does all the dirty work, with Blane getting the credit and collecting the bonuses. They are both in love with Ann Jordan. Fed up with being double-crossed, Durkin quits the team and goes free-lancing on his own...and promptly screws up. Now he has to find a big story to redeem himself in Ann's eyes.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.