You are here:
2016: Obama's America

2016: Obama's America

2012

PG

Director

Dinesh D'Souza, John Sullivan

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

2016: Obama's America takes audiences on a gripping visual journey into the heart of the worlds most powerful office to reveal the struggle of whether one man's past will redefine America over the next four years. The film examines the question, "If Obama wins a second term, where will we be in 2016?" Across the globe and in America, people in 2008 hungered for a leader who would unite and lift us from economic turmoil and war. True to Americas ideals, they invested their hope in a new kind of president, Barack Obama. What they didn't know is that Obama is a man with a past, and in powerful ways that past defines him--who he is, how he thinks, and where he intends to take America and the world. Immersed in exotic locales across four continents, best selling author Dinesh DSouza races against time to find answers to Obama's past and reveal where America will be in 2016.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.2/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film avoids centering LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It treats the expansion of non-heteronormative social norms with skepticism, viewing them as symptoms of a systemic shift rather than providing nuanced representation.

Gender Representation

Limited

Gender dynamics are not a primary narrative driver. The film lacks subversion of gender hierarchies, instead framing the evolution of gender roles as a factor in the destabilization of American social cohesion.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Race is central to the thesis but viewed through a lens of skepticism. The narrative characterizes the emphasis on racial identity as a strategic tool of identity politics used to manipulate the electorate.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The film argues for the preservation of traditional Western institutions. It frames the deconstruction of patriotism, capitalism, and religious structures as a systemic threat to American identity.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film does not engage with themes of physical or neurodivergent disability. It focuses exclusively on macro-political and socioeconomic structures.

Strengths

  • Provides a clear, focused argument for the preservation of traditional Western institutional frameworks.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks meaningful or nuanced representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Fails to engage with themes of physical or neurodivergent disability.
  • Views racial and ethnic diversity through a lens of skepticism rather than organic representation.
  • Does not explore or subvert traditional gender hierarchies.

AI Analysis

This documentary serves as a direct counter-narrative to progressive media. It is designed to critique the very elements—such as intersectionality and identity politics—that define modern inclusive storytelling. Rather than exploring marginalized perspectives, the film prioritizes the defense of established social and economic institutions. It frames the rise of diverse political identities as a threat to national cohesion and traditional Western values. Ultimately, the work functions as a staunchly conservative critique of contemporary social shifts, actively resisting multiculturalism and the deconstruction of traditional hierarchies.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.