You are here:

My Flesh and Blood

Name: My Flesh and Blood
Director: Jonathan Karsh
Released: 2003
Duration: 83 min

Representation Score

3.6/10

Limited

2003

Unrated

Director

Jonathan Karsh

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

My Flesh and Blood is a study of resilience and unconventional domesticity. It succeeds by providing meaningful depth to its subjects, particularly through its nuanced treatment of disability and the subversion of traditional maternal roles. However, the film lacks breadth. It offers almost no representation regarding racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities, focusing instead on a homogeneous domestic unit. Ultimately, the documentary's strength lies in its observational lens, which avoids sentimental clichés to prioritize the authentic ability to act of the family members.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does My Flesh and Blood have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on the Tom family's domestic structure. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities.

How does My Flesh and Blood portray gender?

Fair

Susan Tom serves as a central figure of leadership and ability to act. By centering household management on a female protagonist, the film challenges traditional patriarchal hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is My Flesh and Blood?

Minimal

The film appears to reflect a homogeneous demographic. There is no indication of a non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast within the Tom family.

How does My Flesh and Blood represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film adopts a secular, observational tone rather than a moralistic one. It avoids traditionalist sentimentalism in favor of a raw, humanistic perspective.

Does My Flesh and Blood include disability representation?

Good

The narrative provides a significant role in driving the story to children with serious disabilities and diseases. It prioritizes their lived realities and autonomy over mere plot devices.

Present on Screen

Provides a significant role in driving the story and autonomy to individuals living with serious disabilities.
Challenges traditional patriarchal hierarchies by centering a female protagonist in a leadership role.
Avoids sentimentalism and moralistic clichés in favor of a raw, humanistic perspective.

Limited or Absent

Lacks any documented representation of LGBTQ+ characters or identities.
Shows a lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the depicted family structure.
Provides limited insight into the roles or ability to act of male figures in the household.

Official Synopsis

My Flesh and Blood is a 2003 documentary film by Jonathan Karsh chronicling a year in the life of the Tom family. The Tom family is notable as the mother, Susan, adopted eleven children, most of whom had serious disabilities or diseases. The film itself is notable for handling the sensitive subject matter in an unsentimental way that is more uplifting than one might expect.

How are these scores produced? →