You are here:
Odd Jobs

Odd Jobs

1986

PG-13

Director

Mark Story

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Five college buddies start their own moving business only to find themselves tangling with sleazy competitors and the mob.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.9/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focuses exclusively on a group of male college associates.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story centers on male agency and camaraderie through a male-centric business venture. There is a lack of significant female character arcs or women in leadership roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast appears homogeneous, reflecting a standard non-diverse casting model typical of mid-80s comedies. It lacks diverse ethnic ensembles or intersectional complexity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film explores capitalist themes through small business ownership and competition. It follows a standard moral framework rather than offering a systemic critique of Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Disability is not utilized as a narrative device or plot point.

Strengths

  • The film provides a clear, traditional underdog narrative centered on entrepreneurial struggle.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks LGBTQ+ representation and characters with disabilities.
  • The cast is homogeneous and lacks racial and ethnic diversity.
  • The narrative relies on conventional gendered storytelling with minimal female agency.

AI Analysis

Odd Jobs follows a conventional comedic structure centered on the entrepreneurial struggles of five college buddies. The film relies on the underdog trope, focusing on the friction between legitimate business and organized crime. However, the narrative lacks intentionality regarding social representation. It adheres to the traditional cinematic tropes of its era, prioritizing a male-driven plot that avoids disrupting established social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film functions as a standard genre comedy that lacks intersectional depth or diverse casting.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.