
The Shutka Book of Records
2005

2005
Director
Leonard Retel Helmrich
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Three generations of one family weather the challenges of living in modern-day Indonesia, the largest Muslim community on the globe.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives. This absence reflects the specific cultural and religious context of the Indonesian setting rather than intentional narrative exclusion.
Gender Representation
The narrative subverts patriarchal hierarchies by centering the matriarchal experience. Women are portrayed as the primary drivers of household survival and decision-making, challenging tropes of domestic passivity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film excels by providing a non-Western perspective with a predominantly Indonesian cast. It avoids the white savior lens, allowing characters of color to dictate the pace of their own lives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary offers a nuanced view of life within a major Muslim community. It avoids reductive tropes, focusing instead on how faith and situational morality intersect with extreme poverty.
Disability Representation
There are no centrally developed arcs regarding visible or invisible disabilities. The film focuses on socioeconomic struggles, though it implicitly touches on the vulnerability of those in informal settlements.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Shape of the Moon is a profound ethnographic study that prioritizes the agency of its subjects. By utilizing a direct cinema approach, the film moves away from voyeuristic poverty tropes to explore survival and familial resilience. The documentary's greatest strength is its commitment to authentic, non-Western storytelling. It successfully deconstructs the observer-versus-observed dynamic, allowing the Indonesian family to define their own reality rather than being defined by an outside lens. While the film excels in racial and cultural immersion, it lacks specific representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disability-focused narratives. However, the matriarchal focus provides a strong subversion of traditional gender hierarchies.

2005

2000

2002

2022

2004

2007

2015
2011

2020

2001

2004

2018
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.