You are here:

Git!

Git!

Representation Score

1.4/10

Minimal

1965

Approved

Director

Ellis Kadison

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Git! is a conventional 1965 family genre piece that adheres strictly to the social hierarchies of its era. The plot focuses on a teenage orphan, a wealthy breeder, and a professional trainer, creating a narrative centered on masculine authority and class distinctions. The film lacks depth in representing diverse identities or subverted social roles. It functions as a standard period piece where the characters reflect the demographic homogeneity common in mid-century studio productions. Ultimately, the film provides a narrow window into 1960s social structures, prioritizing traditional roles over any meaningful representation of underrepresented groups.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Git! have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories about non-cisgender identities. It follows the social structures typical of the mid-1960s.

How does Git! portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around a male-dominated hierarchy of breeders and trainers. Power dynamics are based on traditional masculine roles of control and authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Git!?

Limited

The narrative focuses on a homogeneous social group typical of 1960s family cinema. There is no indication of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

How does Git! represent religion and culture?

Limited

Themes of class emerge through an orphan navigating wealthy landowner structures. However, the film operates within a conventional moral framework.

Does Git! include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters use neurodivergence or disability as a narrative device.

Present on Screen

  • Explores themes of class and systemic friction through the protagonist's status as a runaway orphan.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender gender expressions.
  • Features a male-dominated hierarchy with little evidence of gender subversion.
  • Reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1960s cinema without racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Provides no depiction of disability or neurodivergent characters.

Official Synopsis

Deke, a runaway orphan from a boy's home, is arrested when he prevents Art Finney, a trainer for a wealthy California dog breeder, Andrew Garrett, from shooting "Rock", a renegade English setter and alleged animal killer. Garrett has Deke remanded to his custody and gives him a job assisting the (highly) resentful Finney and also working with "Rock", whom Deke insists has the makings of a fine hunting dog. The trainer and owner/breeder don't think so, but they accept the word and non-experience of a 17-year-old orphan?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.