You are here:

A.K.A. Doc Pomus

A.K.A. Doc Pomus

Representation Score

8.8/10

Excellent

2012

Director

Peter Miller, William Hechter

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The documentary excels by weaving together various aspects of identity, such as queer resilience, racial collaboration, and physical disability. It avoids superficiality, using archival materials and journals to create a sophisticated, human-centered portrait of a underrepresented figure. While the film highlights the synergy between different cultures in music, it remains focused on male professional achievements. This limits the breadth of gender representation despite the inclusion of female artists. Ultimately, the work succeeds in challenging traditional biographical narratives. It transforms a personal history into a broader examination of how individuals navigate systemic social and physical barriers.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A.K.A. Doc Pomus have LGBTQ+ representation?

Excellent

The film centers on the experiences of a gay man navigating the mid-20th-century music industry. It provides a nuanced look at queer identity and survival during the HIV/AIDS crisis through private journals.

How does A.K.A. Doc Pomus portray gender?

Fair

The narrative focuses on a male-dominated industry and the subject's personal journey. Although female collaborators and a female producer are included, the story primarily revolves around male professional achievements.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A.K.A. Doc Pomus?

Excellent

This documentary highlights the creative synergy between a white songwriter and Black R&B artists. It portrays the music industry as a place where racial boundaries were navigated through shared artistic expression.

How does A.K.A. Doc Pomus represent religion and culture?

Good

The film embraces moral complexity and subjective truths rather than traditional religious frameworks. It explores the tension between individual identity and the systemic pressures of mid-century American institutions.

Does A.K.A. Doc Pomus include disability representation?

Excellent

The film provides exceptional representation by centering on a subject with dwarfism and polio. It avoids stereotypes and instead examines how the subject navigated a world not designed for his physical stature.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a powerful depiction of physical disability without relying on inspirational stories.
  • Offers a nuanced exploration of queer identity and survival during the HIV/AIDS crisis.
  • Shows strong portrayal of racial integration and creative synergy within the R&B industry.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative remains heavily centered on male professional achievements and journeys.
  • Gender representation is limited by the focus on a male-dominated musical era.

Official Synopsis

Doc Pomus’ dramatic life is one of American music’s great untold stories. Paralyzed with polio as a child, Brooklyn-born Jerome Felder reinvented himself as a blues singer, renaming himself Doc Pomus, then emerged as one of the most brilliant songwriters of the early rock and roll era, writing “Save the Last Dance for Me,” “This Magic Moment,” “A Teenager in Love,” “Viva Las Vegas,” and dozens of other hits. Spearheaded and co-produced by his daughter, Sharyn Felder, and packed with incomparable music and rare archival imagery, this documentary features interviews with collaborators and friends including Dr. John, Ben E. King, Joan Osborne, Shawn Colvin, Dion, Leiber and Stoller, and B.B. King, as well as passages from Doc’s private journals read by his close friend Lou Reed.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.