You are here:

Do We Really Need the Moon?

Name: Do We Really Need the Moon?
Director: Tim Lambert
Released: 2011

Representation Score

5.3/10

Fair

2011

Director

Tim Lambert

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary centers on planetary science and celestial mechanics, avoiding social narratives. Given its focus on astronomy, the film does not delve into interpersonal dynamics or social issues. However, it makes a conscious effort to diversify scientific authority by featuring Maggie Aderin-Pocock, which challenges traditional homogeneity in educational media. Ultimately, the film provides a more inclusive perspective on STEM disciplines, setting it apart from typical educational programming.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Do We Really Need the Moon? have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary focuses on astronomical phenomena and does not explore LGBTQ+ identities or narratives involving non-straight relationships.

How does Do We Really Need the Moon? portray gender?

Fair

Maggie Aderin-Pocock serves as the main guide, challenging traditional gender roles in STEM fields. Her presence highlights female expertise in a discipline historically dominated by men.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Do We Really Need the Moon??

Good

The casting of Maggie Aderin-Pocock, a prominent Black scientist, adds diversity to the face of scientific authority. This departs from conventional, Western-centric academic portrayals.

How does Do We Really Need the Moon? represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film sticks to a secular, scientific framework emphasizing empirical data. It does not delve into religious or mythological interpretations of the moon.

Does Do We Really Need the Moon? include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary does not address disability, neurodivergence, or physical impairments as central themes or character elements.

Present on Screen

Features a prominent Black female scientist as the primary authority, adding diversity to STEM.
Challenges traditional gender hierarchies by centering female expertise in space science.
Departs from conventional, Western-centric academic casting patterns.

Limited or Absent

Lacks exploration of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives involving non-straight relationships.
Does not engage with diverse religious or mythological interpretations of the moon.
Provides no representation regarding disability or neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

The moon is such a familiar presence in the sky that most of us take it for granted. But what if it wasn't where it is now? How would that affect life on earth?

How are these scores produced? →