You are here:
Amsterdam

Amsterdam

2022

R

Director

David O. Russell

Runtime

134 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the 1930s, three friends—a doctor, a nurse, and an attorney—witness a murder, become suspects themselves and uncover one of the most outrageous plots in American history.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.0/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film adheres to traditional narrative structures regarding romantic pairings. It does not prioritize queer-coded subtext or non-cisnormative identities as primary drivers for character development.

Gender Representation

Good

Margot Robbie’s character disrupts 1930s hierarchies by possessing significant professional agency. She maintains intellectual parity with her male counterparts and drives the investigative momentum forward.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The casting avoids the homogeneity typical of period pieces by including John David Washington in a central, high-agency role. Characters of color are integrated into the core social fabric.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative critiques the corruption of political and capitalist institutions. It explores how individual ethics must often supersede rigid state or religious authority during times of systemic upheaval.

Disability Representation

Fair

The story focuses on psychological pressures and political conspiracies rather than disability. There is no prominent focus on visible or invisible disabilities as central to character identity.

Strengths

  • The female protagonist possesses significant professional agency and intellectual parity with the male leads.
  • Casting provides a meaningful departure from 1930s norms by placing characters of color in high-agency roles.
  • The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of traditional political and capitalist power structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks a prominent or specialized focus on visible or invisible disabilities.
  • LGBTQ+ representation remains within conventional bounds without prioritizing non-cisnormative identities.
  • Romantic pairings follow traditional narrative structures rather than exploring queer-coded subtext.

AI Analysis

Amsterdam succeeds in deconstructing 1930s power dynamics by providing agency to marginalized voices within a historical setting. The film moves away from tokenism, particularly through its casting and the professional autonomy granted to its female lead. However, the film remains conventional in its treatment of LGBTQ+ identities and lacks a meaningful focus on disability. While it challenges institutional corruption, it does not use queer or disabled perspectives to drive the central plot. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its refusal to treat historical institutions as bastions of stability, instead framing them as sites of corruption and systemic struggle.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.