You are here:

A Glitch in the Matrix

Name: A Glitch in the Matrix
Director: Rodney Ascher
Released: 2021
Duration: 108 min

Representation Score

5.6/10

Fair

2021

Director

Rodney Ascher

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Rodney Ascher’s documentary serves as a philosophical exploration of simulation theory rather than a character-driven social drama. Its main strength lies in its postmodern structure, which aims to disrupt the viewer's reliance on objective reality and established truths. The film challenges traditional perceptions of truth and identity by using digital avatars to obscure interviewees. However, it lacks explicit representation of underrepresented identities. While its themes challenge traditional social hierarchies, the absence of specific data on racial, gendered, or LGBTQ+ subjects limits its social impact.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Glitch in the Matrix have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film explores the concept of reality, challenging assumptions about straight relationships. However, it does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or stories, resulting in a moderate score.

How does A Glitch in the Matrix portray gender?

Fair

By focusing on disrupting conventional thinking, the film avoids reinforcing traditional gender roles. Specific ways the film challenges these roles are not detailed.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Glitch in the Matrix?

Fair

The documentary includes real people and unconventional figures. There is not enough information to confirm a diverse cast or specific characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity.

How does A Glitch in the Matrix represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative promotes skepticism by questioning Western scientific traditions. It highlights the artificial nature of existence, aligning with anti-materialist themes.

Does A Glitch in the Matrix include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no specific information about the inclusion of neurodivergent individuals or those with physical disabilities.

Present on Screen

The film challenges traditional perceptions of truth and objective reality.
It avoids reinforcing traditional gender roles by focusing on intellectual disruption.
The deconstruction of Western empirical traditions aligns with anti-materialist themes.

Limited or Absent

The documentary lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ subjects or narratives.
There is insufficient evidence to confirm racial diversity or multi-layered casting.
The film provides no specific evidence regarding the inclusion of individuals with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Are we in fact living in a simulation? This is the question postulated, wrestled with, and ultimately argued for through archival footage, compelling interviews with real people shrouded in digital avatars, and a collection of cases from some of our most iconoclastic figures in contemporary culture.

How are these scores produced? →