You are here:

The Phantom

The Phantom

Representation Score

4.7/10

Fair

2021

Director

Patrick Forbes

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film serves as a mid-range representation work that prioritizes systemic critique over overt social activism. Its primary value lies in examining how institutional structures impact individual lives within a high-stakes judicial context. While the documentary lacks diversity in terms of LGBTQ+ or disability representation, it finds depth in its exploration of identity and the potential for state-sanctioned error. The narrative's focus on a person of color within the justice system provides a necessary lens for discussing systemic fallibility.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Phantom have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses solely on legal proceedings and the central figure's claims.

How does The Phantom portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers around a male protagonist and a female character who is a victim. It functions as a biographical examination of a legal case without challenging traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Phantom?

Good

The film explores a person of color navigating the Western judicial system. The central mystery regarding identity suggests a potential look at systemic errors or misidentification.

How does The Phantom represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary challenges the perceived infallibility of Western legal institutions. It critiques state power and the finality of capital punishment through the lens of judicial error.

Does The Phantom include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical disabilities, neurodivergence, or mental health conditions in this work.

Present on Screen

  • Engages with critiques of the legal establishment and state power.
  • Explores the complexities of identity and potential misidentification within the justice system.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Provides no documented coverage of disability or neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

Carlos DeLuna was arrested in 1993 aged 21 for the murder of Wanda Lopez, and protested his innocence until his execution, declaring that it was another Carlos who committed the crime.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.