You are here:
Wide Load

Wide Load

2019

Director

Bertrand Blier

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This is the story of a guy who goes too fast and a big guy who is too slow. Foster meets Taupin. All this would be trivial if one of them had a scary scenario, the scenario of their lives and their deaths. Just open the pages and shake.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film centers on the friction between Foster and Taupin. While Blier often explores fluid sexuality, there is no explicit evidence of queer identity or same-sex intimacy in the narrative.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story focuses on a dichotomy of temperament between two men. It suggests a departure from traditional masculine archetypes by emphasizing existential crisis over stoicism.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

There is no information regarding the racial composition of the cast. The production lacks specific details to confirm an intersectional or diverse ensemble.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative prioritizes existentialist themes and moral relativism. It uses a postmodern lens to critique societal structures and traditional institutional morality.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no information regarding characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • The director's history of subverting social norms and challenging traditional interpersonal hierarchies.
  • A thematic focus on existentialism that moves beyond traditional masculine archetypes of control.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit evidence regarding racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Absence of clear, visible LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.

AI Analysis

Wide Load functions as a character study that leans heavily into existentialism and the disruption of traditional narrative pacing. The film's strength lies in its potential to subvert social norms through the director's established absurdist style. However, the work lacks explicit visibility. There is a notable absence of information regarding racial diversity and specific LGBTQ+ identities, which limits the film's inclusive impact. Ultimately, the film appears to prioritize philosophical inquiry over broad demographic representation, focusing instead on the subjective experiences of its central male protagonists.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.