New Showbiz

You are here:
Back to the Moon

Back to the Moon

2019

Director

Charles-Antoine de Rouvre

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Back to the Moon has amazing footage, amazing music and great editing. There is no narration but composition of videos and pictures with Apollo conversations and then TV anchorman's commentaries. Taken all together, it really made me feel a part of the 1969 and helped me to see how big step for mankind happened on 20 January of the same year.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. As an archival documentary focused on 1969 space missions, it lacks any representation of queer identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Agency is almost exclusively held by male astronauts and news anchors. This reflects the systemic gender hierarchies and masculine archetypes of the late 1960s.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The visual landscape is dominated by white subjects. This reflects the socio-political realities of the era and the lack of diverse voices in the space program.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film celebrates Western technological triumph and patriotism. It presents a cohesive view of historical milestones through a specifically Western lens without broader cultural critiques.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of individuals with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The focus remains strictly on the technical aspects of the lunar mission.

Strengths

  • Provides an immersive, sensory-driven experience of the 1969 moon landing.
  • Uses authentic Apollo mission audio and period-specific news broadcasts effectively.
  • Maintains high historical fidelity by utilizing strictly archival materials.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of diverse voices or non-Anglo-Saxon agency.
  • Reinforces traditional masculine archetypes and historical gender hierarchies.
  • Offers a narrow, Western-centric view of technological and human progress.

AI Analysis

Back to the Moon acts as a sensory time capsule, utilizing a rhythmic montage of Apollo mission audio and historical news broadcasts. It prioritizes historical fidelity over modern social perspectives, immersing viewers in the 1969 zeitgeist through archival footage. Because the film relies entirely on period-accurate materials, it inherently mirrors the social hierarchies of the late sixties. The lack of diversity is a byproduct of its commitment to preserving the era's specific cultural and systemic realities. Ultimately, the documentary functions as a celebration of Western institutional achievement. It does not attempt to subvert or disrupt the traditional structures of the time, but rather presents them as they were.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.