You are here:

Acceptable Risks

Name: Acceptable Risks
Director: Rick Wallace
Released: 1986
Duration: 92 min

Representation Score

4.7/10

Fair

1986

Director

Rick Wallace

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Acceptable Risks functions as a conventional 1980s cautionary tale centered on industrial negligence and political corruption. The narrative prioritizes a critique of institutional authority over the representation of diverse social identities. While the film effectively deconstructs the infallibility of corporate and political hierarchies, it remains demographically narrow. The focus on male-driven professional crises and a homogeneous cast limits its multi-layered depth. Ultimately, the film serves as a social critique of capitalism and governance rather than a vehicle for identity-based representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Acceptable Risks have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any visible LGBTQ+ characters or storylines, focusing instead on industrial and civic issues without engaging with non-straight relationships.

How does Acceptable Risks portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on traditional masculine archetypes, with male protagonists in leadership roles solving problems. It relies on familiar male-driven narratives rather than challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Acceptable Risks?

Limited

The cast reflects a homogeneous social structure typical of mid-80s Australian television, with no significant racial blending or diverse casting.

How does Acceptable Risks represent religion and culture?

Good

The film strongly critiques Western institutional structures and unregulated capitalism, portraying corporate and political authorities as corrupt entities prioritizing profit over human life.

Does Acceptable Risks include disability representation?

Limited

There is no focus on physical disabilities or neurodivergence within the character arcs. The film treats systemic institutional failure as the main form of incapacity.

Present on Screen

Offers a sharp critique of unregulated capitalism and corporate greed.
Effectively deconstructs the corruption inherent in top-down political hierarchies.

Limited or Absent

Lacks multi-layered complexity and diverse casting.
Relies on traditional masculine archetypes for its central protagonists.
Provides no representation for LGBTQ+ or disabled identities.

Official Synopsis

The manager of a chemical plant and a city manager rise up against their respective bosses to keep a town safe in this ecologically conscientious made-for-TV disaster film. It all begins when the owners of Citichem order the plant manager to enact dangerous cost cuts that compromise the safety of the plant. He protests, but it is to no avail and a worker dies. At the same time, the city manager tries to warn the people that a deadly disaster is imminent, but he ends up gagged by the local politicians. Meanwhile, just when the community is at its most unprepared, a melt-down occurs and the town is drenched in deadly chemicals.

How are these scores produced? →