You are here:

It's Tough to Be a Bird

It's Tough to Be a Bird

Representation Score

3.3/10

Limited

1969

G

Director

Ward Kimball

Runtime

21 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Ward Kimball’s film serves as a specialized study of the natural world, focusing on bird behavior. By concentrating on animals, it avoids reinforcing human social hierarchies. However, this focus limits its exploration of human social issues. The film does not aim to address human identity, the way different parts of someone's identity overlap, or systemic reforms. It reflects the observational limitations of its era, prioritizing naturalism over social issues. Ultimately, while the film avoids many traditional clichés by focusing on animals, it fails to engage meaningfully with the diverse spectrum of human experiences.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does It's Tough to Be a Bird have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or stories. Its focus on bird behavior and human perception means it doesn't explore sexual orientation or gender identity.

How does It's Tough to Be a Bird portray gender?

Fair

Gender representation is limited to observations of avian species. Since the film focuses on birds, it neither reinforces nor challenges human gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is It's Tough to Be a Bird?

Limited

The documentary lacks a diverse range of human characters or multi-layered identities. Its focus on the natural world reflects the observational limitations of its time period.

How does It's Tough to Be a Bird represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film examines how humans perceive nature but does not engage with systemic critiques of religion, capitalism, or Western institutions.

Does It's Tough to Be a Bird include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Human characters and avian metaphors do not address these themes.

Present on Screen

  • Avoids reinforcing human social hierarchies by focusing on non-human subjects.
  • Uses animation to question the idea of human intellectual superiority over nature.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not intentionally address human identity, the way different parts of someone's identity overlap, or progressive social narratives.
  • Does not engage with systemic critiques of Western institutions or cultural structures.

Official Synopsis

Part cartoon and part documentary, this film offers a humorous look at birds and the ways people perceive them.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.