You are here:
Tale of a Forest

Tale of a Forest

2012

Director

Kim Saarniluoto, Ville Suhonen

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A documentary that unveils the primeval forests of Northern Finland, some of Europe's sole remaining, old-growth forests. The main characters of the film are the various inhabitants of the forest: the bears and the elk, the snakes and the owls, the ants, the frogs and the flying squirrels, the ancient soul birds such as the Siberian Jay, the Lapland Owl and many, many others.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.7/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses entirely on the biological behaviors of forest fauna. There are no human characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The narrative centers on ecological cycles rather than human protagonists. Consequently, the film does not engage with or reinforce traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Set in Northern Finland, the film features wildlife rather than human subjects. There is no depiction of human racial or ethnic diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film de-centers Western human institutions by prioritizing ecological systems. It offers a passive environmentalist stance rather than an active critique of cultural institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

Because the film lacks human characters, there is no representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities within a social context.

Strengths

  • Provides a non-anthropocentric perspective that de-centers human institutions.
  • Focuses on the intrinsic value of old-growth ecosystems and biological interconnectedness.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks human representation, precluding engagement with social identity or diversity categories.
  • Does not offer an active critique of cultural institutions, maintaining a passive environmentalist stance.

AI Analysis

Tale of a Forest is a natural history documentary that prioritizes the biological presence of Northern Finland's old-growth forests. Because the subjects are non-human species like bears, elk, and owls, the film lacks the traditional framework required to analyze human-centric identity politics or social hierarchies. While the film scores low on social identity metrics due to the absence of human protagonists, it succeeds in offering a non-anthropocentric worldview. It shifts the focus from human social agency to the intrinsic value of ecological interconnectedness. Ultimately, the work functions as a pure ecological study. It avoids social commentary in favor of documenting the primeval soul of the forest and its various inhabitants.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.