You are here:

What's Up, Tiger Lily?

What's Up, Tiger Lily?

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

1966

PG

Director

Woody Allen, Senkichi Taniguchi

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

What's Up, Tiger Lily? is a postmodern experiment that prioritizes stylistic disruption over social commentary. By repurposing Japanese action footage with American comedic dubbing, it achieves a unique cross-cultural blend that challenges the era's standard cinematic homogeneity. However, the film's reliance on existing footage limits its ability to provide meaningful representation. Characters lack significant roles in driving the story, and the narrative structure does not allow for the development of complex identities regarding gender, sexuality, or disability. Ultimately, the film is a landmark of cinematic collage. While it succeeds in blurring the lines between Eastern and Western genres, it remains a work of absurdist pastiche rather than a vehicle for progressive identity politics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does What's Up, Tiger Lily? have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender expressions. Its fragmented, collage-like editing prevents the development of queer narratives.

How does What's Up, Tiger Lily? portray gender?

Limited

Female characters appear mainly as visual elements or subjects of comedy. They lack significant roles in driving the story and do not challenge traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is What's Up, Tiger Lily??

Fair

The film disrupts Anglo-centric dominance by featuring a predominantly Japanese cast. This cross-cultural blending challenges the homogeneous cinematic standards of the 1960s.

How does What's Up, Tiger Lily? represent religion and culture?

Fair

The work celebrates stylistic absurdity rather than critiquing systemic power. It does not engage explicitly with anti-Western or anti-capitalist themes.

Does What's Up, Tiger Lily? include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of visible or invisible disabilities within the footage or comedic framework.

Present on Screen

  • The use of Japanese source material provides a notable instance of cross-cultural cinematic blending.
  • The film disrupts the traditional Anglo-centric dominance common in 1960s Western comedy.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks narrative depth required for meaningful character's ability to drive the story or diverse representation.
  • There is a complete absence of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities.
  • Female characters function primarily as visual elements rather than active agents in the story.

Official Synopsis

In comic Woody Allen's film debut, he took the Japanese action film "International Secret Police: Key of Keys" and re-dubbed it, changing the plot to make it revolve around a secret egg salad recipe.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.