You are here:

Who's Done it ?

Who's Done it ?

Representation Score

1.8/10

Minimal

1944

Director

Ahmad Badrakhan

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Who's Done it? is a traditional crime drama focused on inheritance, legitimacy, and the disruption of familial lineage. The story uses a foundling cliché to explore deception and the consequences of moral failings within a patriarchal framework. The film prioritizes melodrama and vengeance over broader social critiques. While it delves into class-based conflicts over a Pasha's wealth, it remains within the bounds of mid-20th-century dramatic conventions. Ultimately, the work lacks complexity in reflecting multiple aspects of identity. It serves as a study of individual deception rather than a challenge to the social hierarchies of the era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Who's Done it ? have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any characters with non-straight sexual orientations or non-cisgender identities. The story revolves around traditional marriage and family structures.

How does Who's Done it ? portray gender?

Limited

A woman uses tactical deception to secure an inheritance, showcasing her ability to drive the story within domestic settings. However, her actions are limited to maintaining patriarchal lineage.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Who's Done it ??

Fair

The film likely reflects the local demographics of its 1944 production context. There is no indication of challenging ethnic hierarchies.

How does Who's Done it ? represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative centers on established social institutions such as family honor and traditional justice. It does not provide a critique of these frameworks.

Does Who's Done it ? include disability representation?

Minimal

Neither visible nor invisible disabilities are portrayed as central to the character arcs or the progression of the plot.

Present on Screen

  • The plot features a woman using strategic deception to secure material wealth.
  • The narrative effectively uses the foundling cliché to drive themes of legitimacy and vengeance.

Limited or Absent

  • The story strictly follows traditional patriarchal structures and inheritance laws.
  • The film lacks representation of non-straight sexual orientations or systemic social critiques.

Official Synopsis

Before his death, Mansour Pasha writes over his wealth to his two sons Omar and Othman; as the latter drowns, his wife gets a boy and claims he is Othman's son to ensure her share in the inheritance. When the boy grows older, he befriends Rashad, Omar's son, and gates of hell and vengeance open.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.