You are here:
Alexander: The Other Side of Dawn

Alexander: The Other Side of Dawn

1977

NR

Director

John Erman

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In this sequel to Dawn: Portrait of a Teenage Runaway, Alexander's story is told in both the past and the present. Alexander's parents send him away from home for being too sensitive and not helping enough on their farm. He goes to Los Angeles in hopes of going to art school, but when he can't find a job as a minor, he turns to prostitution. After being arrested, he wants to head to Arizona to marry Dawn, but he falls into a lucrative job/relationship with a gay football star.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.3/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Excellent

The film disrupts heteronormative norms by centering a relationship between the protagonist and a gay football star. This connection challenges traditional gender and sexuality binaries by placing a queer character in a hyper-masculine role.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative critiques patriarchal structures by framing the protagonist's sensitivity as a source of conflict. It subverts traditional masculinity by contrasting emotional vulnerability against the rigid, labor-focused expectations of a rural setting.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

There is little evidence regarding the racial composition of the cast or ethnic dynamics in Los Angeles. The story focuses more on class and sexuality than on specific racial or ethnic representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film explores moral complexity by depicting sex work as a survival mechanism rather than a moral failing. It critiques the traditional nuclear family by portraying the parental home as a site of rejection.

Disability Representation

Minimal

While the protagonist is described as being too sensitive, there is no clear evidence of a formal depiction of disability or neurodivergence in the narrative.

Strengths

  • Challenges heteronormative archetypes by featuring a gay athlete in a central role.
  • Critiques rigid patriarchal expectations through the protagonist's emotional sensitivity.
  • Avoids moralistic judgment when depicting sex work and economic survival.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks verifiable evidence regarding racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Provides no clear representation or formal depiction of disability or neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

This character study stands out for its willingness to navigate taboo subjects like queer identity and sex work through a lens of survival. By centering a protagonist who exists outside traditional agrarian and heteronormative success, the film actively deconstructs social hierarchies. The narrative's strength lies in its refusal to use moralistic condemnation. Instead, it examines the systemic pressures of economic instability and the failures of the family unit. However, the film lacks verifiable intersectional diversity. The focus remains heavily on class and sexuality, leaving the racial and ethnic landscape of the urban setting largely unexamined.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.