
The Price of Love
1995

1977
NRDirector
John Erman
Runtime
96 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In this sequel to Dawn: Portrait of a Teenage Runaway, Alexander's story is told in both the past and the present. Alexander's parents send him away from home for being too sensitive and not helping enough on their farm. He goes to Los Angeles in hopes of going to art school, but when he can't find a job as a minor, he turns to prostitution. After being arrested, he wants to head to Arizona to marry Dawn, but he falls into a lucrative job/relationship with a gay football star.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film disrupts heteronormative norms by centering a relationship between the protagonist and a gay football star. This connection challenges traditional gender and sexuality binaries by placing a queer character in a hyper-masculine role.
Gender Representation
The narrative critiques patriarchal structures by framing the protagonist's sensitivity as a source of conflict. It subverts traditional masculinity by contrasting emotional vulnerability against the rigid, labor-focused expectations of a rural setting.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is little evidence regarding the racial composition of the cast or ethnic dynamics in Los Angeles. The story focuses more on class and sexuality than on specific racial or ethnic representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores moral complexity by depicting sex work as a survival mechanism rather than a moral failing. It critiques the traditional nuclear family by portraying the parental home as a site of rejection.
Disability Representation
While the protagonist is described as being too sensitive, there is no clear evidence of a formal depiction of disability or neurodivergence in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
This character study stands out for its willingness to navigate taboo subjects like queer identity and sex work through a lens of survival. By centering a protagonist who exists outside traditional agrarian and heteronormative success, the film actively deconstructs social hierarchies. The narrative's strength lies in its refusal to use moralistic condemnation. Instead, it examines the systemic pressures of economic instability and the failures of the family unit. However, the film lacks verifiable intersectional diversity. The focus remains heavily on class and sexuality, leaving the racial and ethnic landscape of the urban setting largely unexamined.

1995

2003

2019

1977

1988

1981

1981

2021

1991

1994

1975

1994
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.