
Things to Come
2016

2009
Director
Mia Hansen-Løve
Runtime
111 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Grégoire Canvel has everything a man could want. A wife he loves, three delightful children and a stimulating job. He's a film producer. Discovering talented filmmakers and developing films that fit his conception of the cinema-free and true to life-is precisely his reason for living. Yet his prestigious production company, Moon Films, is on its last legs. Too many productions, too many risks, too many debts. Storm clouds are gathering. But Grégoire ploughs on at all costs. Where will his blind obstinacy lead him?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a traditional nuclear family structure. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the primary character arcs.
Gender Representation
The narrative offers a balanced depiction of gendered experiences. It avoids the 'competent patriarch' trope by showing the protagonist's vulnerability and how grief affects both parents differently.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story is a localized study of the Parisian intellectual middle class. The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the specific socioeconomic milieu of the setting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film adheres to a secular, naturalistic tradition. It focuses on the fragility of the family unit and individual psychological trauma rather than religious or systemic critiques.
Disability Representation
There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film focuses on the psychological toll of grief through a lens of naturalistic mourning.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mia Hansen-Løve’s drama is a quiet, character-centric study that prioritizes emotional authenticity over social commentary. It functions as a naturalistic exploration of loss within a specific social class, which results in a lack of diverse representation. The film maintains a heteronormative and demographically homogeneous framework. By focusing on the internal landscapes of a Parisian intellectual family, it avoids challenging systemic power dynamics or presenting intersectional identities. Ultimately, the work is a traditional humanistic drama. It succeeds in its psychological realism but lacks the intentionality required to disrupt demographic norms or represent marginalized groups.

2016

2019

2011

2013

2014

2011

2015

2008

2004

2012

2012

2015
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.