You are here:

Jury Duty: The Comedy

Jury Duty: The Comedy

Representation Score

3.8/10

Limited

1990

PG

Director

Michael Schultz

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jury Duty: The Comedy operates as a mid-range social comedy that relies heavily on well-known character types. While the ensemble cast creates narrative tension through various socioeconomic backgrounds, the film leans into comedic clichés rather than deep identity exploration. The production uses a diverse cast of jurors to drive the plot, yet the characterizations often fall into predictable patterns. The focus remains on the sensationalism of a criminal trial and the sudden celebrity status of the protagonist. Ultimately, the film presents a broad social spectrum without significantly challenging systemic hierarchies or multi-layered issues.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jury Duty: The Comedy have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. The story centers around the protagonist's romantic pursuits, indicating a traditional focus on heterosexual relationships.

How does Jury Duty: The Comedy portray gender?

Fair

Female characters frequently play stereotypical roles, such as high-priced call girls or voluptuous witnesses. However, the ex-hippie character Abby offers a chance to explore ability to act outside typical domestic roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jury Duty: The Comedy?

Fair

The film includes a mix of jurors representing different social backgrounds, but specific racial identifiers are not detailed. The aim is to show social variety without delving deeply into multi-layered issues.

How does Jury Duty: The Comedy represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story highlights conflicts between different social classes and lifestyles. It uses sensationalism and media attention to emphasize the volatility of social institutions and class tensions.

Does Jury Duty: The Comedy include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities depicted or mentioned in the character descriptions.

Present on Screen

  • The ensemble cast provides a diverse cross-section of social strata and lifestyles.
  • The inclusion of counter-cultural characters like Abby suggests a disruption of conventional femininity.
  • The narrative explores interesting conflicts between different socioeconomic classes.

Limited or Absent

  • Female characters often rely on traditional, formulaic archetypes related to sexuality.
  • The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer undertones.
  • There is a lack of specific detail regarding racial and ethnic diversity.

Official Synopsis

Mild and meek accountant Sanford Lagelfost has been charged with embezzling $3 million dollars from Trout Industries. A decidedly mixed bag of jurors are chosen to serve on the case, including Eddie, a waiter; Rita, a high-priced call girl; Phil, a high-powered businessman; and Abby, a rabble rousing ex-hippie. When the star witness, the voluptuous Hope Hathaway, takes the stand, she startles everyone with her stories of Sanford's Lothario-esque conquests. Suddenly, the unassuming Sanford is a celebrity heartthrob and he finds himself in headlines and gossip columns across the country. Due to the case's growing notoriety, the judge sequesters the jury. And things start to get wild...

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.