You are here:

Jury Duty

Name: Jury Duty
Director: John Fortenberry
Released: 1995
Duration: 88 min

Representation Score

2.4/10

Limited

1995

PG-13

Director

John Fortenberry

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jury Duty follows a traditional mid-90s comedic structure centered on a single, individualistic premise. The narrative focuses on Tommy Collins' attempt to exploit the jury sequestration process for personal comfort and financial gain. Since the story is driven by this specific character study, it lacks the complexity needed to address broader social or systemic issues. The film adheres to standard genre conventions rather than attempting to disrupt established social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film functions as a character-driven comedy that avoids meaningful engagement with diverse identities or cultural critiques.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jury Duty have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses solely on the protagonist's personal motivations, providing no visibility for non-straight identities.

How does Jury Duty portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on a male protagonist motivated by self-interest. There is little evidence of women playing significant roles or challenging traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jury Duty?

Limited

The narrative does not provide information about the racial makeup of the jury or legal professionals. It does not show meaningful racial diversity or inclusive casting.

How does Jury Duty represent religion and culture?

Limited

The plot follows a comedic 'get-rich-quick' idea rather than a deeper exploration of cultural or religious themes. It emphasizes individual opportunism over cultural or religious frameworks.

Does Jury Duty include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

The film offers a clear, character-driven comedic premise centered on individual opportunism.

Limited or Absent

The narrative lacks complexity and fails to represent diverse racial, gender, or LGBTQ+ identities.
The story misses opportunities to provide systemic critiques of social or legal institutions.

Official Synopsis

When jobless Tommy Collins discovers that sequestered jurors earn free room and board as well as $5-a-day, he gets himself assigned to a jury in a murder trial. Once there, he does everything he can to prolong the trial and deliberations and make the sequestration more comfortable for himself.

How are these scores produced? →