
A.C.O.D.
2013

2012
PG-13Director
Robert Pulcini, Shari Springer Berman
Runtime
103 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A failed New York playwright stages a suicide in an attempt to win back her ex, only to wind up in the custody of her gambling-addict mother.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film provides a foundational context for queer liberation by dismantling heteronormative social expectations. While it does not explicitly center same-sex intimacy, it explores the broader expansion of personal identity.
Gender Representation
This documentary excels at subverting traditional gender hierarchies by centering on intellectual agency. It portrays patriarchal structures as obstacles and frames female political leadership as the primary narrative driver.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The focus remains on the gendered experience within a predominantly white-led institutional framework. While the feminist movement involved complex intersections of race, the film's lens is more specific to the subject's sphere.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a deep critique of traditional Western institutions and rigid mid-century social structures. It celebrates the disruption of established social orders through journalism and protest.
Disability Representation
Disability is not a central narrative component of this biographical study. Psychological pressures are framed through political struggle rather than specific neurodivergent or physical disability narratives.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The documentary is a powerful study of gendered power structures and the deconstruction of mid-century social norms. By focusing on Gloria Steinem's intellectual and political agency, it successfully challenges traditional masculine authority and domestic expectations. However, the film's biographical focus limits its intersectional breadth. The narrative primarily operates within a white-led institutional framework, which restricts the depth of racial and ethnic diversity. Similarly, disability is treated as a byproduct of social pressure rather than a distinct lived experience. Ultimately, the film is a significant work of progressive storytelling. It achieves high marks for its cultural critique and gender subversion, even as it remains tethered to the specific historical context of its subject.

2013

2015

2011

2012

2016

2017

2012

2017

2008

2014

2014

2012
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.