
Mother at War
2020

2025
Director
Renaud Bertrand
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
1944. In France, devastated by the German occupation, part of the population resists the yoke of the occupiers, men and women who become heroes despite themselves by becoming active members of the Vaucluse resistance. Mother Madeleine, head of an institute for deaf girls, is one of these heroic women. She hides Jewish children and members of the Resistance in her convent, in defiance of the German threat.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit mentions of LGBTQ+ identities or romantic pairings. While the convent setting offers potential for exploring non-traditional gender roles, no queer subtext is confirmed.
Gender Representation
The narrative subverts wartime tropes by centering female agency and leadership. Women act as the strategic architects of resistance, disrupting conventional male-dominated military heroism.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story highlights intersectional vulnerability through the protection of Jewish refugees. This focus addresses systemic oppression and moves away from homogeneous nationalistic storytelling.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film portrays religious institutions as sites of active subversion rather than mere complicity. It prioritizes humanitarian ethics and the protection of the 'other' over institutional loyalty.
Disability Representation
The inclusion of an institute for deaf girls suggests a functional portrayal of disability. Deafness appears integrated into the resistance mechanics rather than treated as a deficit.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Résistantes distinguishes itself by centering marginalized identities as the primary drivers of wartime survival. By focusing on a convent led by Mother Madeleine, the film shifts the heroic lens from traditional military combat to strategic, female-led resistance. The narrative effectively weaves together ethnic, religious, and sensory diversity. The protection of Jewish refugees and the utilization of a deaf girls' institute provide layers of agency to characters who are often sidelined in historical dramas. While the film excels in portraying intersectional vulnerability and deconstructing power structures, it remains silent on explicit LGBTQ+ representation. Overall, it offers a sophisticated look at how diverse groups navigate systemic oppression.

2020

1983

1965

2018

2011

1959

2007

1946

1960

2020

2011

1960
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.