The Shakedown
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Action Man
1967
Director
Jean Delannoy
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An American talks a retired French crook into robbing a bank, but kidnappers demand the loot as ransom.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.4/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the conventional social structures of 1967. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Agency is concentrated in male protagonists, focusing on masculine-coded archetypes of crime. The film offers little evidence of elevating female intellect or subverting masculine leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative reflects the demographic homogeneity typical of mid-century French genre cinema. There is no indication of a multi-ethnic cast or high-agency non-white characters.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story functions as a standard genre piece rather than a systemic critique. It does not frame traditional family structures or Western institutions as inherently oppressive.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
- The film functions as a cohesive, standard genre piece within the French crime tradition.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks diverse representation across gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities.
- The film fails to provide systemic critiques of social or political institutions.
- Agency is heavily concentrated in male characters, limiting gender diversity.
AI Analysis
Action Man operates as a conventional crime drama that follows the established cinematic norms of 1960s French cinema. It prioritizes genre tropes over social subversion, resulting in a narrative that reinforces the status quo of its era. The film lacks intentionality regarding intersectional representation. Instead of disrupting social hierarchies, the story centers on traditional masculine archetypes and a localized European perspective. Ultimately, the work serves as a standard genre exercise. It provides little meaningful engagement with diverse identities or systemic critiques of the social and political structures of the time.
Similar Movies
Fly Now, Pay Later
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Seven Golden Men
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Fighter
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Secret Honeymoon: Assault Train
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Gangster Story
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
Crime on a Summer Morning
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
The Beast Is Loose
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Jack of Diamonds
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Traitor's Gate
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Hot Summer Night
1957
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
Boomerang
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.