
Come on Roland!
1966

1976
Director
Jacques Rozier
Runtime
145 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Jean-Arthur has been working as a clerk in a travel agency. One day, he, along with his colleague comes to a brilliant idea: what if I offer tourists real extreme recreation? So the group of tourists land on a deserted island with no food, no shelter, nothing.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. While the director's New Wave background often explores unconventional dynamics, no queer narratives are confirmed.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male protagonist and his colleagues. While the survival premise could disrupt domestic roles, there is no specific detail regarding female character arcs.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on travel agency employees and tourists without evidence of a non-white majority cast. There is no indication of intentional intersectional or race-bent casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques capitalist-driven leisure by transforming recreation into a survival ordeal. The deserted island setting strips away traditional religious, patriotic, and structured family norms.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the provided narrative details.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Jacques Rozier’s background in the French New Wave suggests an intent to disrupt traditional cinematic hierarchies through experimentalism. This structural rebellion is the film's primary progressive driver, even when explicit identity-based representation is absent. The film excels at deconstructing social institutions, specifically the travel industry and consumerist leisure. By placing characters in a survivalist vacuum, it challenges the stability of Western societal norms. However, the work lacks clear evidence of intersectional diversity. The focus remains heavily on a male-centric group, leaving questions regarding racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ representation unanswered.

1966

2004

2016
2002

1976

2005

1969

1962

2015

1971

2015

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.