New Showbiz

You are here:
Nightmares Come at Night

Nightmares Come at Night

1970

Director

Jesús Franco

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Diana Lorys, Collette Jack and Soledad Miranda star in this sexy thriller about two alluring dancers, Cincia and Anne, who embark on an erotically charged partnership. But when Anne starts to have nightmares that feature her as a murderous killer, she begins to lose her grip on reality. Or is reality merely rearing its ugly head in her dreams? She's determined find out what's causing this turmoil before something deadly happens.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film centers on an erotically charged partnership between two female dancers. While it lacks formal labels for their orientation, the intense shared eroticism suggests a departure from heteronormative structures.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering female agency. The protagonists drive the plot through their professional identities and internal psychological struggles rather than serving as passive objects.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast appears predominantly European, featuring a Mediterranean presence via Soledad Miranda. There is little evidence of significant racial blending or a departure from 1970s casting norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film favors a secular, postmodern approach by blurring dreams and reality. It challenges objective truth and institutional morality in favor of a complex, subjective character study.

Disability Representation

Fair

Mental instability and recurring nightmares serve as central plot drivers. However, the portrayal risks using psychological distress as a stylistic device rather than a nuanced study of neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • Strong female agency through protagonists who drive the narrative via their own professional and psychological lives.
  • Subversion of heteronormative structures through the intense, erotic partnership between the two lead dancers.
  • A complex, postmodern approach to morality that favors subjective reality over institutional or religious guidance.

Areas for Improvement

  • Limited racial and ethnic diversity, appearing to follow standard 1970s European casting demographics.
  • Potential reliance on mental instability as a mere stylistic device rather than a nuanced portrayal of neurodivergence.
  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ specificity regarding the characters' formal identities.

AI Analysis

Jesús Franco’s thriller succeeds in subverting traditional power dynamics by placing female subjectivity at the heart of the narrative. The protagonists are active participants in their own psychological descent, which provides a refreshing shift from typical masculine-driven horror tropes. However, the film's diversity is limited by its era and genre. The lack of explicit LGBTQ+ identity and the predominantly European casting prevent a higher score in those categories. Additionally, the treatment of mental health feels more atmospheric than deeply empathetic. Ultimately, the film is a study in psychological ambiguity. It trades didactic moralizing for a complex, subjective exploration of the human psyche, making it a notable example of transgressive European cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.