You are here:

Braddock: Missing in Action III

Braddock: Missing in Action III

Representation Score

0.8/10

Minimal

1988

R

Director

Aaron Norris

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Braddock: Missing in Action III is a classic 1980s action film that prioritizes individualistic heroism over social complexity. The narrative structure relies on clear-cut moral binaries and traditional power dynamics. The film reinforces established cultural and political norms of its era. It avoids moral relativism, instead presenting a Western-centric view of conflict and heroism. Representation is largely functional to the plot. While the protagonist's motivation involves diverse characters, the core leadership and ability to act remain centered on a traditional, white, hyper-masculine archetype.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Braddock: Missing in Action III have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or storylines. It sticks to typical 1980s archetypes without exploring non-traditional gender identities.

How does Braddock: Missing in Action III portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on a highly masculine hero and upholds traditional male-dominated structures. Female characters mainly serve as secondary or motivational figures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Braddock: Missing in Action III?

Limited

The plot involves an Asian spouse and Amerasian children, but core leadership roles remain mostly white. Ethnic diversity serves the plot but does not provide actively leading characters.

How does Braddock: Missing in Action III represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The story follows a Western moral framework through an anti-communist lens. It emphasizes singular morality centered on Western military heroism and family protection.

Does Braddock: Missing in Action III include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined almost exclusively by their combat utility and physical abilities.

Present on Screen

  • The plot introduces Amerasian children and an Asian spouse as central motivators for the protagonist.
  • The film provides a clear, high-stakes mission centered on protecting a family unit.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks women's ability to drive the story, relegating women to secondary or motivational roles.
  • Core leadership roles lack racial diversity, remaining predominantly white and Anglo-Saxon.
  • The narrative fails to represent any physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • There is no exploration of LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender expressions.

Official Synopsis

When Colonel James Braddock is told that his Asian wife and 12-year-old son are still alive in Communist Vietnam, he mounts a one-man assault to free them. Armed with the latest high-tech firepower, Braddock fights his way into the heart of the country and ends up battling his way out with several dozen abused Amerasian children in tow! Struggling to keep them alive while outmaneuvering a sadistic Vietnamese officer, Braddock ignites the jungle in a blazing cross-country race for freedom.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.