You are here:

Yours in Sisterhood

Yours in Sisterhood

Representation Score

9.6/10

Excellent

2018

Director

Irene Lusztig

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Irene Lusztig’s documentary uses a unique performance-based method to connect 1970s feminist activism with contemporary identity. By having strangers read historical letters, the film creates a dialogue between past struggles and current social realities. The work excels at storytelling that reflects multiple aspects of identity, moving beyond a single perspective on feminism. It successfully challenges patriarchal and Western institutional norms. However, the film's focus remains heavily on gender and racial dynamics. While it touches on socioeconomic factors, specific narratives regarding disability are less central to the core storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Yours in Sisterhood have LGBTQ+ representation?

Excellent

The film explores the relationship between gender liberation and queer identity. It avoids assuming everyone is straight or cisgender by treating diverse gender identities as important to the fight for bodily autonomy.

How does Yours in Sisterhood portray gender?

Excellent

This documentary focuses on overturning traditional gender hierarchies. By highlighting women's roles in organizing and advocating for themselves, it places women at the forefront of shaping their social reality.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Yours in Sisterhood?

Excellent

The narrative emphasizes that gender cannot be separated from race and class. It avoids a color-blind approach, instead providing a detailed look at how systemic oppression affects women of color.

How does Yours in Sisterhood represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques traditional Western institutions, including religious hierarchies and the nuclear family. It also looks at how economic structures and labor exploitation disproportionately affect women.

Does Yours in Sisterhood include disability representation?

Fair

Disability is not the main focus of the narrative. While the film touches on how health intersects with social access, it lacks strong narratives where disabled individuals play central roles.

Present on Screen

  • Effective use of storytelling that reflects multiple aspects of identity to connect historical activism with modern identity.
  • Strong challenge to traditional gender hierarchies through the lens of women's organizing and advocacy.
  • Avoids assumptions that everyone is straight or cisgender by integrating queer identity into the broader feminist struggle.

Limited or Absent

  • Disability representation is secondary and lacks narratives where disabled individuals play central roles.
  • The narrative focus leans heavily toward gender and race, potentially overshadowing other multi-layered identities.

Official Synopsis

What might be revealed in the process of inviting strangers to act out and respond to 1970s feminism forty years later? Between 2015 and 2017, hundreds of strangers in communities all over the US were invited to read aloud and respond to letters from the 70s sent to the editor of Ms. Magazine–the first mainstream feminist magazine in the US. The intimate, provocative, and sometimes heartbreaking conversations that emerge from these spontaneous performances make us think critically about the past, present, and future of feminism.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.