The Amorous Sisters
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Guess Who's Coming for Breakfast
1968
Director
Erwin C. Dietrich
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Young widow Madame Yanne takes care of her pretty nieces Florentine and Juliet, who are currently living out their lesbian obsessions and are currently more engaged with each other than turning their heads around the lusty male world.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.3/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on the romantic and sexual preoccupations of Florentine and Juliet. Their lesbian identities drive the character arcs, disrupting 1960s heteronormative comedy expectations.
Gender Representation
Female desire serves as the central engine of the plot. The protagonists act as agents who reject traditional courtship, though Madame Yanne's caretaker role maintains some domestic structure.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focus remains on interpersonal dynamics within a specific social strata. There is no evidence of a non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film challenges 1968 social mores by depicting lifestyles outside conventional matrimonial norms. It offers a mild critique of traditional structures without engaging in systemic political critique.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the character descriptions.
Strengths
- Centering LGBTQ+ agency as a primary narrative driver rather than a comedic trope.
- Subverting traditional gender hierarchies by prioritizing female desire over male attention.
- Critiquing patriarchal pursuit by allowing protagonists to reject conventional courtship.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and narrative focus.
- Absence of representation regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
- Limited engagement with systemic or political critiques beyond social mores.
AI Analysis
The film stands out for its progressive handling of LGBTQ+ agency during the late 1960s. By making lesbian identity the primary driver of the plot, it avoids the era's tendency to treat such identities as mere peripheral tropes. However, the film's impact is limited by a lack of breadth. It does not provide representation for different racial or ethnic groups, nor does it address disability, focusing instead on a narrow social stratum. Ultimately, while the film subverts gender hierarchies and heteronormative expectations, its narrow demographic scope prevents a higher overall diversity score.
Similar Movies
Secrets of a French Maid
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Young Seducers
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Young Seducers 3
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Voluptuous Vixens
1972
No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available
Self Service Girls
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
The Bed Hostesses
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Swingin' Stewardesses
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
Eros Therapy
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.5 out of 10
La Cage aux folles
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
69 + 1
2021
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
Cassanova Was a Woman
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.