The Sexual Story of O
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The House on Beaver St.
1970
XAverage Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Skin flick about massage parlor
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.6/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks documented LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. While 1970s underground cinema often contained queer subtext, there is no evidence of nuanced representation or agency here.
Gender Representation
Female characters are central to the massage parlor setting but primarily serve as objects of the gaze. There is no indication of women driving the plot through intellect or strength.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film lacks verified evidence regarding racial composition or intersectional identities. Historical context suggests potentially homogeneous casting typical of 1970s exploitation cinema.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative bypasses traditional Western moralities through its transgressive subject matter. However, this appears to be a genre convention rather than a deliberate socio-political critique.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the film's context.
Strengths
- The film exists outside traditional mainstream moralities and Western social decorum.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks nuanced character agency and intersectional representation.
- Female characters function more as objects of the gaze than autonomous individuals.
- There is no evidence of diverse racial or ethnic casting.
AI Analysis
The House on Beaver St. is a 1970s adult drama that functions primarily as a genre-specific exploitation film. Its focus is narrow, centering on the mechanics of a massage parlor rather than complex character development or social commentary. While the film operates outside mainstream moral boundaries, it lacks the intersectional agency or intentional systemic critique necessary for a higher diversity score. The representation present is largely a byproduct of the era's underground cinema conventions. Ultimately, the film provides a baseline level of inclusion common to its genre but fails to offer documented depth in terms of racial, gendered, or queer identity.
Similar Movies
The Sensuous Teenager
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Sensualidad
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Orgy at Lil's Place
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Don't Just Lay There!
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Fleshpot on 42nd Street
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Marsha: The Erotic Housewife
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Go Naked in the World
1961
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Exhibitionist
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
The Beginning at Fifteen
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
For Members Only
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Palace of Venus
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.