You are here:
The Internecine Project

The Internecine Project

1974

PG

Director

Ken Hughes

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Offered a job as a presidential adviser, a professor is forced to dispose of those who knew him when he was a spy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film features an all-male ensemble within a penal setting. There is no depiction of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The narrative functions as a strictly masculine space focused on prison hierarchies. It lacks significant female characters or female agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The cast is predominantly white, following mid-1970s British crime drama conventions. No non-Anglo-Saxon characters are shown in positions of agency.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The plot disrupts conventional morality by centering on a criminal conspiracy. It utilizes moral relativism and explores the breakdown of institutional trust.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined by criminal status rather than disability.

Strengths

  • The narrative offers psychological sophistication by deconstructing concepts of group loyalty.
  • The film explores complex moral relativism rather than relying on simple righteous archetypes.
  • It provides a cynical, postmodern look at institutional corruption and authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks gender diversity, offering almost no female agency or presence.
  • There is a total absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, remaining almost entirely homogeneous.

AI Analysis

The film is a period-specific thriller that relies heavily on demographic homogeneity. It lacks meaningful representation across LGBTQ+, gender, and racial categories, reflecting the social constraints of 1970s British cinema. However, the work finds depth through its narrative architecture. By rejecting traditional moralism in favor of a relativistic view of human behavior, it offers a more cynical and sophisticated psychological study than a standard morality play. Ultimately, while the film fails to meet modern intersectional standards, its deconstruction of loyalty and authority provides a compelling, if narrow, thematic complexity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.